The first thing Gideon did after the divine visitation was to
smash down the altar of Baal, the deity of the idol worshiping
Midianites. As expected, this caused no
small amount of commotion, and when the Midianites learned that Gideon was the
culprit, they surrounded the house of his father (Joash) and demanded that
Gideon pay for the deed with his life.
But Joash replied to the hostile crowd around him, “Are you going to plead Baal’s cause? Are you trying to save him? … If Baal really is a god, he can defend himself when someone breaks down his altar…. Let Baal contend with him.”
I often think of this story whenever I hear of yet another
episode of Muslim’s rising up in anger whenever they feel their religion or
their prophet Mohammed has been insulted.
This happens all too often, with the most recent episode playing out at
U.S. embassies across the Middle East, as angry mobs have been stirred up into violent
and homicidal protests over some amateur YouTube video that allegedly insults
the prophet Mohammed. The reaction is
typical and predictable, as demonstrated by countless similar episodes, from
the death threats against Salman Rushdie for writing The Satanic Verses to the frenzied mobs rising up over some Danish
cartoons that supposedly insulted Mohammed.
The reaction is so predictable, that many in the west prefer
to curtail our rights to free speech lest we offend the sensibilities of the Muslim
world. Yet no one seems to be as
concerned about offending the sensibilities of Jews or Christians. Why not?
Are they hostile to Judaism and Christianity and therefore consider them
fair game? Perhaps, but it is more
likely a tacit admission that the Judeo-Christian ethic is generally more level
headed and civilized, and is not expected to react violently when insulted.
Christians in particular expect
to be insulted, because their Lord was reviled, insulted and persecuted to the
point of death. Jesus himself warned
us: “If the world hates you, keep in
mind that it hated me first.” When Christianity
in general or Jesus in particular are insulted, Christians may be grieved--even
outraged--but there is no need to demand justice or retribution. For example, when a sick minded “artist”
named Andres Serrrano plunged a crucifix into a jar of urine and displayed it as “art”,
Christians were understandably angry, particularly because their tax dollars
were subsidizing such trash through the National Endowment for the Arts, but
there were no angry mobs or threats of violence. Again, Christians expect to be insulted. It is par for the course.
More importantly, Christians understand that if their Lord and God is who He claims to be, He has no need to be defended. The all powerful, sovereign Lord of heaven and earth can defend himself, and His Name and Cause will be vindicated. This is something that insecure Muslims don’t seem to get. To paraphrase what Joash said to the Midianites about Baal: “If it is indeed true that there is only one god Allah, and Mohammed is his only prophet, let Allah contend. Let Mohammed contend.”
2 comments:
You're such a good Christian. It's interesting to note that the two mobs were similar.
Thank you.
Actually, the mob of Midianites was a little more civilized because (1) they had more of a legitimate grievance, because their place of worship was actually desecrated and (2) theirs was not a violent indiscriminate frenzy that took it out on everybody. They only wanted Gideon's head for the offense. Still, the point remains and the comparison is valid.
Post a Comment